I'm familiar with Macbeth from previous performances, and of course from reading the play itself. The lead characters' passion and eventual moral corruption and downfall leave a trail of blood and horror by the time the curtain falls, so obviously, I had an idea what to expect.
But I wasn't expecting this. And I don't mean that in a good way.
M. Gaines' production of "Comedy of Errors", which rightly won the Jeff last year, was a prime example of how directoral creativity can work well: a well scripted and acted outer envelope around the original work of Shakespeare, deliniated by the 'director' yelling "Action" or "Cut". And it wasn't just that it was a farce that made it more enjoyable to me - it was that it was simply well done, and made the actors, who were 'playing' actors, seem more real.
This version of Macbeth, however, left me feeling uneasy. No - it left me feeling downright disturbed at parts. While modern revisionism isn't something I take issue with (my favourite example: I once saw a version of "Love's Labours.." that was set in the 60's, with nehru jackets and Beatles-esque music), I felt that this production was disturbing just for the sake of shock value, just because it *could* be disturbing.
As mentioned by others, one of the key issues with this production is the voice-effect for the witches. Being familiar with the work, I knew what was going on, but I literally heard patrons all around me stating "I have no idea what they're saying." It's never a good idea to let your effects overshadow the dialogue.
I can appreciate the Macbeth heeds the Witches' warnings about MacDuff being a threat, and surprises his castle - the original source called for the decimation of his entire lineage (just like that of Banquo). What I don't appreciate is M. Gaines' need to portray a young boy being savagely murdered on stage, and crying out "Mommy!" as he falls dead. Worse still is when Macduffs' family are seen later while Lady Macbeth is sleepwalking, and they are strung up by the feet, hanging upside down, bloodied and butchered. This includes a young girl of perhaps 5 or 6. Purely, completely gratuitous.
These aspects, and others (a fetus being shown ripped from a witch's womb; the opening scene where an opposing soldier is cruelly, savagely gutted, etc) do not 'push the envelope' or make the play more memorable in a good way. Sadly, they reflect the MTV-ness that has become our culture. So sad that it has to be projected onto one of the Bards plays, and worse still, onto Navy Pier.
The acting was by and large wonderful, as it always is at this theater, in particular Karen Aldridge's "Lady Macbeth", Evan Buliung's "Macduff", and the subdued yet evocative performance by James Newcomb as "Ross". Mike Nussbaum absolutely steals the show with his (ad-libbed?) porter, who eventually makes his way to the pounding on the door, but still finds his palm empty despite his entreaties to not be forgotten.
The acting aside, however, I truly feel that this production was not of the same calibre as "Errors" or "Othello"Forgive me if I come across as a Luddite, but I was sorely disappointed.
Gare_NY